Generate new evidence & insights.
We answer critical research questions and develop foundational methodologies, addressing intersectional challenges and research and evidence gaps.
Led by GDI Hub at University College London, with academic and community partners globally, this cluster will answer critical research questions and develop foundational methodologies to support the evidence base for best practices in assistive technology provision in low- and middle-income countries.
Sub-Programmes
- Data and Evidence Portal: Our Data and Evidence portal combines research from the Rapid Assessments of Assistive Technology and various global studies. The portal aims to improve access to life-changing assistive technology for all.
- What Works: The What Works project focuses on research related to the AT2030 programme, aiming to answer specific questions and gather insights.
- Mobile & Emerging Technology: Mobile and emerging technologies are enhancing assistive devices with features like text-to-speech and eye-gaze control, improving accessibility. However, questions persist about the effectiveness of mobile devices as assistive technology.
- Fellowship Programme: Our Fellowships programme will accelerate emerging talent, helping to answer key research questions.
Latest
-
Dot Glasses Field Trial Template Pack
Dot GlassesJuly 8, 2026KenyaAT2030 ResourcesDot Glasses Field Trial Template Pack
-
Simplified Refraction Eyewear for Low Resource Settings Field Trial Toolkit - DOT Glasses
Dot GlassesJuly 8, 2026KenyaCase Studies and ReportsThis toolkit is a practical guide for delivering simplified refraction eyewear in low-resource settings. It draws on a field trial conducted across seven community sites in Nairobi and Kiambu Counties in June August 2025. It is designed to help teams: • deliver vision camps safely and efficiently • maintain protocol and data quality • generate evidence that supports real decisions about scale. This toolkit focuses on how to deliver. It covers field operations, ethics and safeguarding, monitoring, and partner roles, based on what worked in practice.
-
Seeing Clearly: The Impact of Affordable Eyeglasses on Daily Life in Kenya
Global Disability Innovation Hub, Dot Glasses, Senses HubJuly 8, 2026KenyaCase Studies and ReportsThe report draws on survey, questionnaire, and interview data from people who received eyeglasses through the trial. Participants reported meaningful improvements in daily activities such as reading, phone use, schoolwork, and mobility, alongside increased independence and confidence. Experiences were not uniform: some participants reported discomfort or more modest benefits, and a small minority reported no improvement or reduced independence
-
A Critical Review of Sexuality, Technology and Disability
Patel Dilisha, Ekat Osipova, Dr Giulia Barbareschi, Katta SpielJuly 8, 2026GlobalAcademic Research PublicationsThe investigation of technologies facilitating sexual interactions and sexuality-related explorations is becoming more established in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), albeit with little systematic attention to the sexual lives of disabled people. In this space, we undertook a literature review utilising feminist content analysis to take stock and critically analyse the domains of sexuality, technology and disability when they intersect. Our approach aligns with the broader goals of promoting inclusivity, diversity, and equity in technology design and application. We present a descriptive and analytical outline of existing research on sexuality, technology and disability through which we identified unmarked norms governing research.
-
Seeing Clearly: The Impact of Affordable Eyeglasses on Daily Life in Kenya
Dot GlassesJuly 8, 2026KenyaAT2030 ResourcesThe report draws on survey, questionnaire, and interview data from people who received eyeglasses through the trial. Participants reported meaningful improvements in daily activities such as reading, phone use, schoolwork, and mobility, alongside increased independence and confidence. Experiences were not uniform: some participants reported discomfort or more modest benefits, and a small minority reported no improvement or reduced independence